<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celcom-DiGi Sign MoU for Advanced Network Collaboration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.malaysianwireless.com/2010/06/celcom-digi-sign-mou-for-advanced-network-collaboration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.malaysianwireless.com/2010/06/celcom-digi-sign-mou-for-advanced-network-collaboration/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kugan</title>
		<link>http://www.malaysianwireless.com/2010/06/celcom-digi-sign-mou-for-advanced-network-collaboration/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Kugan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malaysianwireless.com/?p=1849#comment-514</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m closing the comment section. You may comment and share your opinions once the MoU is finalised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m closing the comment section. You may comment and share your opinions once the MoU is finalised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kugan</title>
		<link>http://www.malaysianwireless.com/2010/06/celcom-digi-sign-mou-for-advanced-network-collaboration/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Kugan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malaysianwireless.com/?p=1849#comment-516</guid>
		<description>My statement did not mention anything about transceiver. I said base station and there are so many things on a base station right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My statement did not mention anything about transceiver. I said base station and there are so many things on a base station right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kugan</title>
		<link>http://www.malaysianwireless.com/2010/06/celcom-digi-sign-mou-for-advanced-network-collaboration/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>Kugan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malaysianwireless.com/?p=1849#comment-515</guid>
		<description>As I said earlier, this is an MoU, nothing is confirmed. At this point, everyone have their opinion, so do u. Nothing to hide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said earlier, this is an MoU, nothing is confirmed. At this point, everyone have their opinion, so do u. Nothing to hide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent9300</title>
		<link>http://www.malaysianwireless.com/2010/06/celcom-digi-sign-mou-for-advanced-network-collaboration/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent9300</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malaysianwireless.com/?p=1849#comment-510</guid>
		<description>thanks Kugan for allowing to publish the comments... we learn from each other right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks Kugan for allowing to publish the comments&#8230; we learn from each other right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest02</title>
		<link>http://www.malaysianwireless.com/2010/06/celcom-digi-sign-mou-for-advanced-network-collaboration/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malaysianwireless.com/?p=1849#comment-511</guid>
		<description>So in other words = Sharing Telco Tower la. Where ever Celcom hav. Digi can placed their Equipment too. Fuiyo. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not sharing their network (Router,Switches &amp; Important Data/Routing)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So in other words = Sharing Telco Tower la. Where ever Celcom hav. Digi can placed their Equipment too. Fuiyo. </p>
<p>Not sharing their network (Router,Switches &#038; Important Data/Routing)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gileiole</title>
		<link>http://www.malaysianwireless.com/2010/06/celcom-digi-sign-mou-for-advanced-network-collaboration/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>Gileiole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 01:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malaysianwireless.com/?p=1849#comment-509</guid>
		<description>Vincent, you are right! You can have RAN sharing but not the transceivers. &lt;br&gt;Kugan buddy...you have to really understand the cellular technology before posting something STUPID.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vincent, you are right! You can have RAN sharing but not the transceivers. <br />Kugan buddy&#8230;you have to really understand the cellular technology before posting something STUPID.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent9300</title>
		<link>http://www.malaysianwireless.com/2010/06/celcom-digi-sign-mou-for-advanced-network-collaboration/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent9300</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malaysianwireless.com/?p=1849#comment-499</guid>
		<description>Gileiole, I agree with u, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Better mobile coverage by sharing the network could also mean that DiGi making use of Celcom&#039;s base station to provide cellular coverage, not necessary roaming.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, Kugan has misunderstood that base station transceiver can be shared..thats the most NON sharable piece. Reason is DiGi and Celcom both has 1800 spectrum. One equipment not to transmit 2 1800 bands for 2 different providers...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s not Mobile communication technology, my fren Kugan. It is only happen on IP/INTERNET for VLAN....no VLAN kind of thing on GSM or 3G yet, brother...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gileiole, I agree with u, </p>
<p>&#8220;Better mobile coverage by sharing the network could also mean that DiGi making use of Celcom&#39;s base station to provide cellular coverage, not necessary roaming.&#8221;</p>
<p>Again, Kugan has misunderstood that base station transceiver can be shared..thats the most NON sharable piece. Reason is DiGi and Celcom both has 1800 spectrum. One equipment not to transmit 2 1800 bands for 2 different providers&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#39;s not Mobile communication technology, my fren Kugan. It is only happen on IP/INTERNET for VLAN&#8230;.no VLAN kind of thing on GSM or 3G yet, brother&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gileiole</title>
		<link>http://www.malaysianwireless.com/2010/06/celcom-digi-sign-mou-for-advanced-network-collaboration/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Gileiole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malaysianwireless.com/?p=1849#comment-494</guid>
		<description>Sharing the network is not somethinh new. It has been the practice in most part of the world. The impact of the MOU as shared by you is very misleading. All this while I thought I can get some good understanding of the cellular system from you but no more now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharing the network is not somethinh new. It has been the practice in most part of the world. The impact of the MOU as shared by you is very misleading. All this while I thought I can get some good understanding of the cellular system from you but no more now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest0101</title>
		<link>http://www.malaysianwireless.com/2010/06/celcom-digi-sign-mou-for-advanced-network-collaboration/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>guest0101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malaysianwireless.com/?p=1849#comment-493</guid>
		<description>anything can be shared (technically)......lets wait and see. i don&#039;t think both celcos know (or confirm) what they going to share as yet...in my opinion, signing MoU just to kick start the sharing initiatives</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anything can be shared (technically)&#8230;&#8230;lets wait and see. i don&#39;t think both celcos know (or confirm) what they going to share as yet&#8230;in my opinion, signing MoU just to kick start the sharing initiatives</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kar SiongC</title>
		<link>http://www.malaysianwireless.com/2010/06/celcom-digi-sign-mou-for-advanced-network-collaboration/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>Kar SiongC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malaysianwireless.com/?p=1849#comment-913</guid>
		<description>Yes Kugan. i email to aduan@skmm.gov.my and also to CFM. 

i dont aspect this large move made by this two telco. all i mean is for better coverage for Digi user. 

well this &quot;Sharing&quot; hopefully is shaere of Tower Structure ... and not sharing the BACK HAUL. 

Yes i agree with Blog owner view ... sharing of the &quot;Capacity&quot; will eventually hurt Digi Data user. 

i hope Digi dont pinch down back Celcom and &quot;Bluff&quot; off by Celcom to share the Capacity with Celcom. 

Digi have a well maintain and stable network now now and weak coverage for now, if we compair one to one with Celcom. Celcom have low speed broadband but large coverage.

Finger Cross ... we all Pray ... Digi u are the smarter choice. and THIS TIME also must Choose to SMART ... don bully by Celcom .... :) 

well i hope this blog is readed by Both Telco if possible ... :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Kugan. i email to <a href="mailto:aduan@skmm.gov.my">aduan@skmm.gov.my</a> and also to CFM. </p>
<p>i dont aspect this large move made by this two telco. all i mean is for better coverage for Digi user. </p>
<p>well this &#8220;Sharing&#8221; hopefully is shaere of Tower Structure &#8230; and not sharing the BACK HAUL. </p>
<p>Yes i agree with Blog owner view &#8230; sharing of the &#8220;Capacity&#8221; will eventually hurt Digi Data user. </p>
<p>i hope Digi dont pinch down back Celcom and &#8220;Bluff&#8221; off by Celcom to share the Capacity with Celcom. </p>
<p>Digi have a well maintain and stable network now now and weak coverage for now, if we compair one to one with Celcom. Celcom have low speed broadband but large coverage.</p>
<p>Finger Cross &#8230; we all Pray &#8230; Digi u are the smarter choice. and THIS TIME also must Choose to SMART &#8230; don bully by Celcom &#8230;. :) </p>
<p>well i hope this blog is readed by Both Telco if possible &#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

