Study Finds Radio Spectrum Auctions Prone to Anti-Competitive Behavior
A new study filed with the USA’s telecoms regulator, the FCC reports that the regulator’s use of auctions for assigning spectrum licenses could be subject to anti-competitive behavior by incumbent carriers. The announcement about the new study came from M2Z, a company which is seeking to build its own wireless network.
The study performed by Dr. Simon Wilkie, former chief economist at the FCC and current head of the University of Southern California Center for Communications Law and Policy, reviews past auction results and finds that auctions do not work in all circumstances to secure for the public the benefits of the efficient use of spectrum as the law requires the FCC to do. For example, in the recent AWS auctions, the study found that 98% of the spectrum in major metropolitan areas went to incumbents, effectively shutting out any new entrants.
The report identified and analyzed four anti-competitive tactics that it said incumbents use to manipulate the spectrum auction process:
- Strategically warehousing spectrum in order to prevent entry for potential competitors;
- Delaying the decision-making process at the FCC by drawing out debates over service rules and unquantifiable arguments over technical matters and other means
- Adopting a no holds barred bidding strategy to block new entrants in auctions with insufficient safeguards against incumbent carriers’ potentially anti-competitive tactics, and no caps on the overall amount of spectrum that incumbents may hold; and
- Slicing new available bands for private commercial use that make it more costly or impossible to build a viable national competitive business plan to challenge the incumbents’ dominant position.
The study was requested by M2Z Networks, Inc., which has an application pending before the FCC seeking a 15 year lease for spectrum in the 2155-2175 MHz range. In return, M2Z has promised to build a fast, free, family-friendly wireless broadband network that will reach 95% of all Americans within 10 years.
“Although spectrum auctions are championed as the transparent means to an end of always efficiently assigning spectrum to its highest and best use, a review of past auction results reveals this is not always so.” said Dr. Wilkie. “Recent advances in auction theory and evidence in the record suggests that the regulatory and auction processes at the FCC can and has been manipulated by incumbents to prevent or delay market entry by new innovative competitors like M2Z. This can lead to sub-optimal assignment of licenses and potentially large losses to consumer welfare.”
“As Silicon Valley investors, we know that there is a clear need for an open and affordable platform like M2Z’s network for the new and innovative broadband applications being developed here, said Geoff Yang of Redpoint Ventures, one of M2Z’s investors. “As Dr. Wilkie’s paper points out, entrenched competitors can use the lengthy rule making processes and open-ended auctions to prevent entry by new competitors like M2Z. The record filed in response to M2Z’s application supports this finding since nearly all of the opponents to M2Z’s license application are entrenched broadband carriers or wireless licensees.”
M2Z, in documents filed with the FCC yesterday, pointed to Section 309(j) of the Communications Act, which gives the FCC full authority to approve M2Z’s application because M2Z has proven its application and supporting commitments are in the public interest.
Around five years ago, 3G license was awarded to TM and Maxis(incumbents), last year MiTV and Time got the license. Few weeks back, 4 other small companies won the WiMAX license. Does the public interest taken into account? or Does MCMC knows what they are doing?